This article highlights some of the key threshold issues that companies should consider in analyzing the potential impact the GDPR may have on their operations…
This will provide an overview of the guidelines involving tips, service charges and tip pooling, the current state of the law that was updated on March 23, 2018 and some suggestions on how to stay compliant.
One issue that can lead to a recall is “mislabeling.” Mislabeling occurs when a food product’s label does not accurately reflect its ingredients.
The litigation-related duty to preserve relevant evidence, including electronically stored information (ESI), is well established and widely known in the legal community and the business world. Despite broad familiarity with this obligation, many corporate litigants have recently been subjected to severe sanctions due to an increasing judicial intolerance for the failure to preserve ESI. While some such sanctions involve the imposition of legal fees, in many instances courts have issued severe adverse jury instructions, effectively destroying a litigant’s chance of prevailing or waging an effective defense.
Electronically Stored Information
In today’s legal climate, even a company’s seemingly innocent delay in implementing an appropriate method to preserve ESI may be catastrophic. As a result, the duty to preserve relevant evidence, including ESI, is too important to ignore, not only for those individuals engaged in litigation on a daily basis but also for company management seeking to control costs and expenses.
This white paper guides litigants through their responsibilities to preserve evidence and provides valuable information on implementing a defensible legal hold process. While reading this paper is an important first step, there is no substitute for a thorough discussion of your specific circumstances as they relate to the matter.